Small Is Beautiful

This is way overdue, but I've been catching up lately an blogposts I've been meaning to.... post, and this is one of them. (Others can be found here, here, and here.)

I posted this video a while back with a discussion of the "Sub4Sub" practice. As a measure to prevent this, YouTube will not allow you to post a comment with this string of characters, so I ended up receiving some personal messages. I can only find two right now, but if I can uncover any others, I will of course share them below.




Hey Emily,

Thanks for another great video. In case you're wondering, the reason I'm giving my response via private message instead of through the comments section is because once I got about 360 words (or 2115 characters) into what became this email, I realized that my response was too long-winded to post without coming off like complete windbag (a fate I may yet fall to). So I figured I'd PM my thoughts to you instead. You can include them in the larger public discussion, if you want, because this message really is my equivalent of a video response - which is something I'm not quite ready (if ever) or able to do at the moment.

Yeah, I feel the same way as you. Quality is king... or queen, if you prefer. Sometimes the whole subscription model seems like a pissing contest to see who can make YouTube and its partners the most money. Aside from bragging rights, the whole numbers game is about generating revenue.

However, when it comes to the issue of Quantity vs. Quality on YouTube - and to lesser extent other similar types of sites - I kind of feel the inverse of what you're saying. Let me explain....

I'm a subscriber to many YouTube channels. And there are some that pump out new content almost every day (and I'm not talking about VEDA, either), but the overall quality of the content is limited and it doesn't get as good some of my favorite channels, like this one. Not all of the popular and prolific channels are like that. However, generally, a higher level of output tends to (though, not always) equate to a lower level of quality. Then, on top of that (though, again, not always), there's the interaction with the content producers and/or channel Admins themselves. Often times it is, at best, sporadic. These content producers rarely respond to their comments sections, so when a viewer throws in his or her opinion, that person can only hope that some other commentator offers a decent response.

What I'll call, "Author Replies," tend to make for more interesting conversations, and, depending on the author, foster more intelligent responses from their viewership. With some of the more popular channels, this level and quality of dialogue just isn't possible. And that's assuming that at least some of these "authors" even read any of their comments at all. The words of "superfluousness321" seems to echo this experience. To quote:

--start-quote-
"I am a nameless, faceless viewer. There is alot to view. Occassionally I throw a comment down the wires, but my use of this media is primarily one way."
--end-quote-

I'm not blaming the popular content creators, because they themselves are limited by the burden of their own success. They probably do it for a living and are constantly producing SOMETHING... ANYTHING. Not to mention having to actually READ the comments (okay, last time I use all caps, I promise). Have you ever read through the comments sections of some the more popular authors? This is a rhetorical question, though I would like to hear any thoughts you might have on it. Speaking for myself, I have done this. Not all the time, but every now and then. It's usually tedious as hell, especially when people start sharing the same idea or the same now-deader-than-disco joke over and over and over again. It must make the content producers that have to slog through this shit on a daily basis scream out to the vlogoverse: "People, please! For the love of all that is good, read some of the previous posts before sharing your 'unique and original insights'!" I mean, yeah, a person could probably better spend their time doing something other than going through pages of user comments, but if a would-be poster cares enough to produce a response, I believe that that person should at least read *some* of the things other people have said to see if maybe someone else might have had the same thought or made the same points already.

Anyway, pardon my rant, but your video brought to mind a few things that I've been somewhat overdue on expressing in writing. I might yet write an essay of some sort on this topic to get it out of my system, but for now there's just this email, so forgive me.

After seeing CodedLockFilms comments, I'm inclined to agree with, um, hir, as well. I too think the whole Viewer Count issue comes down to a fundamental flaw in the way YouTube is set up. CodedLockFilms nailed it: "it should about connections, not numbers." YouTube needs to be more like a social networking site that fosters more meaningful connections between the producers and consumers in the YouTube ecosystem. Out of all the socially oriented sites I use, I find myself spending an increasing amount of time "interacting" with people on YouTube than elsewhere. And that's because it engenders community through common interest (i.e. viewership). Other traditional social networking sites, like Facebook, feel much more insular as natural result of the way they were designed. On Facebook I only interact with people I know who also know (or knew) me, but on YouTube I've had great discussions with people who were previously total strangers.

In some ways, YouTube is stuck in the network TV mentality of drawing in large, primarily passive, viewers, but its the ability to connect, interact, and contribute that separates the quality of my YouTube viewing experience versus what I get from my TV or movie viewing experience.

If you made this far, I thank you for your time, and, once again, for another thought-provoking video.

-TheAnonymousUs3r


YT won't let me comment on Small is Beautiful
That's why you get the comment as a message:

Bookbinding: I loved it! I had a class in school, and we wrote stories and created our own books. I still have mine smewhere.
I've seen sub4sub logos on different youtube channels. I had no idea that there were facebook groups as well. I rather read comments & have a decent discussion in the comments or per video response. than no comments at all. I do weird stuff sometimes, only because I want others to participate in it, that's why I created Clive's Angels.

[Dome / hubertcumberdale2008]

Triple Digit Club Tour

This means I have to virtually give away my banana cookie secrets.


In which Emily gives you a tour of her house.

I think that some people are subscribed to me twice, if that is possible. They show up on my sub list twice, and when I type out all the names, if I don't include them two times, the numbers don't match. And then some other people who subscribe to me, their subscription box is filled with "We sub4sub!" Which I don't do.... I guess this is the equivilant of all the porn/business bots following me on twitter?

OMG! The sub knows who sxephil is!!!

In which Emily (who is 24) shares about students' misperceptions about her, how Philip DeFranco got brought into this, and probably says "PUH lease!" one too many times.

The bit at the end I almost made into a second video, but it didn't quite seem worth it.

They are always surprised when I've seen some viral video. Seriously guys?

If only they knew how much time I spend on YouTube.

Speaking, a recently received a friend request on Facebook from my favorite student...who is in 9th grade in one of the districts I subbed in. Immediately, I called my mom. "Is there any reason I shouldn't accept him?"

"I don't think so. You don't do anything inappropriate on Facebook."

Then he left me a comment about my video You Spell Your Name Wrong, saying that he knows every single kid I mentioned (which is probably a hyperbole...there were names from several different school districts).

This is probably going to cost me my job.


UPDATE: Even if I had more than 100 subscribers, I'd still be allowed to fangirl about this.

You Spell Your Name Wrong

In which Emily shares about how the interesting things parents do when selecting names for their children make her job that much harder.

Thank you to Jer at http://www.nyquil.org for making a widescreen version of the TV test pattern.
You were right. It was useful to someone.

Apologies to:
Charlie McDonnell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVo-S9...
Natalie Tran
http://www.youtube.com/CommunityChannel
Craig Benzine:
http://www.youtube.com/WheezyWaiter

I try to be open minded about most things, I've heard all about registers of speech and communication styles, that different dialects are not "wrong" or "right"....but I wish there was a little more agreement with certain things that affect my life.

The idea with registers of speech is that you have different styles of speech (registers) that you use with people you are more intimate with (usually involving more slang, coloquialisms and the like) as opposed to people you are business like with (usually employing jargon, proper grammar, and and five-dollar words you are comfortable using), with a whole range of in-betweens. The hope is that though you may have your more intimate speech, you are able to use the business-like register when the situation calls for it.

I want to enforce something like this on names. If your name is from a different language, then it should follow the rules of that tongue. If you want to force a pronunciation of a group of letters that breaks away from the rules of your name's language, you can really only do that to those who you're intimate with.

Maybe I'm being snobbish here.

I've also heard many a teacher complain that it is becoming increasingly difficult to teach phonics when students names are phonetical disasters. If you are basing a name on American English, please base the spelling on the same.

But, do what you want. It's a free country, and you're gonna anyhow.

WiisGiving

Some have mentioned that they think I'm being insulting to my father by calling him an old man at heart. This comment was never intended as an insult, and is merely something I've noticed in my nearly 25 years of acquaintance with the man.

My family's reaction to this video:

My dad thought it was really funny.

My mom thought it was funny too.
"But you know what is not funny? The looks of the couch."

The loveseat is where I like to pile my stuff when I come over, and catching that in the video makes her embarrassed.

I also didn't come out and say it, but my father is very good at bowling IRL. I did mention the three 300s he has bowled.

If you aren't familiar with the sport, a 300 is a perfect game, all strikes, a lifetime goal of many.

His first one was bowled on a Friday the 13th.